Saturday, March 13, 2010

That Tricky Little Apostrophe

No piece of punctuation takes more abuse than the apostrophe. In fact, the popular little book, Eats, Shoots, and Leaves, seems inspired primarily by samples the author has collected of misuse of the apostrophe, mostly by famous people. And they abound!
For fun, here is a brief review highlighting some key areas of concern. You decide: Are these sentences correct or not?
1. Name the mall that rewards it
’s customers. (from an ad)
2. Your going to be very surprised.
3. It
’s not uncommon to see this error.
3. This is the Smiths
’ land.
4. We bring greetings from the Smith
’s.
5. This aisle contains apple
’s, orange’s, and grape’s.
6. The 1970
’s offered many opportunities.
7. The mens
’ hats are on that rack.
8. This is Charles
’ book.
9. This is Charles
’s book 

Don’t use apostrophes in normal plurals—ouch!
“But I thought the teacher said to use an apostrophe with an s.”
• generation
’s, cup’s 
• Deliciou’s (from the Apostrophe Protection Society in
   London   

• Chip’s, Sausage’s, Roll’s, Egg’s—from Bennys Cafe (a real    sign)
Use apostrophes with pronoun contractions, but not with possessive pronouns
With pronouns, an apostrophe indicates a contraction, some fairly unusual, but quite acceptable in all but legal language: they
’ve, we’re, you’d, she’s, you’re I’m, it’s (a contraction for it is). However, with possessive pronouns, the possession is indicated by the pronoun—never by an apostrophe: ours, his, hers, yours, theirs, its (the possessive form—no apostrophe). In fact, #2 above is one of the most common punctuation errors—and is the reason I included this reminder!

Use apostrophes for clarification
To avoid confusion, an apostrophe is used with single letters and with the plural form of lower case abbreviations: two s
’s in the word, three bcc’s, his pj’s. When no confusion would result, no apostrophe is needed: 1970s, CPAs, DVDs. Caution: This does not work for names. If your name is Smith, you can’t get by—either on you mailbox or your holiday greeting—with the Smith’s. If you want to be sure we know your name does not end in s, consider: the Smith Family or John and Mary Smith, or give up and use a simple plural: the Smiths.

Follow these steps for real possessive apostrophes
Here
’s my three-step approach for most uses of the possessive apostrophe.
1. Begin with the normal word, singular or plural
—who
    owns (possesses) it?
the men, some girls, a child.
2. Add an apostrophe: the men
’, some girls’, a child’
3. Add an s if there is not one: the men’s, some girls’, a
    child
’s
Note that the apostrophe always goes after the normal word: men (I see the men; not I see the mens, so not mens
’).
If something is owned jointly, one apostrophe will serve: the cat and the dog
’s master. If possession is separate, two apostrophes indicate that: the cats’s and the dog’s food. 

Names cause trouble: Although the same rules apply with names, people get confused. If John Smith owns something, it is John Smith’s. If they are separate owners, it is John’s and Mary’s. If John and Mary Smith own something jointly, it is John and Mary Smith’s, Mr. and Mrs. Smith’s, or the Smiths’.
Here
’s a related cause for trouble: words, especially names, ending in s or an s sound: Charles. So, which is right, Charles’ or Charles’s? This is one of those interesting areas where we confront “divided usage”: either could be right. I love the Gregg Reference Manual’s suggestion here: “Listen to yourself.” If you make Charles’ one syllable, then one s will do—and is cleaner. However, if you make it two syllables, you can convey your pronunciation with the additional s. This is true of other words that end in s: if you hear it, add an s: Congress’s task, the witness’s statement.

Here are some answers
1. Name the mall that rewards it
s customers.
2. You're going to be very surprised.
3. It
’s not uncommon to see this error.
3. This is the Smiths
’ land.
4. We bring greetings from the Smith
s.
5. This aisle contains apple
s, oranges, and grapes.
6. The 1970
s offered many opportunities.
7. The men
’s hats are on that rack.
8. This is Charles
’ book.
9. This is Charles
’s book

There is much more. For further exploration, I suggest the Gregg Reference Manual—my favorite resource. It has many pages—just on the apostrophe!

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Happy National [Good] Grammar Day: March 4

Grammar Still Matters to Most Literate Readers
When you are tempted to push the envelope and decide that many traditional grammar “rules” have become irrelevant, beware. If, for example, you choose the traditional all right instead of the more casual alright, no one will notice, even those who choose to use alright. Yet if you use alright, conservative readers will likely wince. Acceptable grammar usage changes slowly, and this is not a movement where you benefit from being in the forefront!

Here's a little quiz where you can identify what might be considered incorrect and then “fix” it: 
1. His goal was to always win.  
2. Richard and him were the last ones hired.
3. The secret must remain with you and I.
4. They gave the gift to John and myself.

5. Accuracy of movement, like accuracy of words, are essential     to the success of magical rites. 

6. Where is he at?

7. We are striving to make the world a better place to live in.   
 

Comments on the Quiz
1. You may recognize to win as an infinitive. Although conservative writers choose never to split one (as I just avoided), many grammarians suggest that you
“listen to yourself” and see how it sounds—always a good idea when you write. I don't like the sound of this split infinitive, so I might say, His goal was always to win (or) His goal was to win—always. On the other hand, here is a familiar and wonderful split infinitive: To boldly go . . . .

2. Unfortunately, this pronoun error still creeps into good writing. Fixing it may require separating the parts of the subject: Richard was hired. He was hired (both subject words). Richard and he were hired.


3. This is such an uncomfortable error that it clearly causes listeners to squirm; again, separating the two object words helps clarify: with you, with I. Whoops! With you and (with) me.

4. The pronoun myself cannot stand alone—either as a subject or an object. Use it only after you use I: Ouch, I hurt myself (or) I did it myself.

5. When a phrase is set off from the subject, it must be ignored when choosing the verb to use: Accuracy of movement is essential.

 6. Ending a sentence with a preposition has a bad, and undeserved, reputation because too many people fail to see the difference in a proposition and a verb phrase. Clearly, Where is he at? and Where are you going to? are inappropriate because they are redundant. Where is he? and Where are you going? serve the same purpose.

7. Here, live in is a verb phrase, different from live. I am comfortable with this sentence. Of course, if you want to avoid any question, you could use the somewhat stuffy phrase, in which to live.

I challenge you to consider every day a good grammar day!